The Napa County Board of Supervisors is the next stop for Napa Redevelopment Partners' scaled-down Napa Pipe proposal, with 700 to 945 apartments and townhomes and a Costco for the estimated 27,000 Napa County residents who currently drive elsewhere to shop at the bulk-retail giant.
"I think we can confidently say we have left no stone unturned," said Napa County Planning Commissioner Tony Scott at the end of a four-and-a-half-hour public hearing Wednesday afternoon, the latest in a protracted series of public meetings that began in early 2011 and is likely to continue well into 2013 and perhaps even beyond.
The meeting at Copia, during which more than 30 people rose to speak both for and against Napa Pipe, ended with a 3-2 vote by the planning commission to approve the project's environmental impact report (EIR) and send the proposal on to the county board of supervisors.
Commissioners Heather Phillips and Matt Pope were in the minority, voting for the second time against approving the EIR for Napa Pipe.
The proposed development at a polluted former industrial site just outside Napa city limits has been controversial since it was first outlined more than four years ago as a mix of housing and business with 3,000-plus dwelling units.
The project's environmental impact report has been circulated twice, for extended periods, and aired in a series of hours-long public meetings during which scores of county residents took their turn at the microphone to voice their support or opposition.
The planning commission had been split on the proposal since last May, when it voted 3-2 to send Napa Pipe to the supervisors before agreeing to revisit the decision.
The pause gave Napa Redevelopment Partners time to scale its proposal down to one with fewer homes and the addition of Costco.
But while the newest proposal for Napa Pipe is distinctly different from its original plan, Wednesday's comments by the public and commission members generally followed the pattern laid down more than a year ago.
All the speakers appeared to be over 40 — one man said he was almost 92, drawing a round of applause — and were almost evenly divided between opponents and supporters of the development.
Traffic, water and infrastructure impacts recurred as objections from Napa Pipe opponents, while supporters emphasized the promise of affordable housing for county residents and the renewal of the Napa River waterfront property.
Speaker comments from the meeting will be posted Thursday. Click the "Keep me posted" button below for an automatic update whenever we publish news about Napa Pipe.
For more about the Napa Pipe development, including Michael Haley's traffic analysis and links to other reporting, please see our Napa Pipe topic page at napavalley.patch.com/topics/Napa-Pipe. Articles include:
- County Holds Hearings on Napa Pipe
- Comment Period Extended on Napa Pipe Report
- Luce “Happy" to Keep Napa Pipe Industrial
- New Napa Pipe Hearings Set
- Where Do You Stand on Napa Pipe?
- How Big Should Napa Pipe Be?
- Was Law Broken at Napa Pipe Meeting?
- Many Voices Expected at Napa Pipe Hearing
- Napa Pipe Vote Postponed
- Napa Pipe Plan Divides County Planners
- Napa Pipe Hearings Canceled as Developers Revise Proposal
- Napa Pipe Returns to Planning Commission
Napa Patch is now Napa Valley Patch: Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news | Got something to say? Start a blog and share your views with the valley.