.
Feedback

Parking Fees Nixed at Free Sonoma County Beaches

Good news for Napa County residents who like the beach: Sonoma County's zoning board has rejected a state bid to charge for parking at 10 beaches where access currently is free. The state has 10 days to appeal.

By Bay City News Service

The Sonoma County Board of Zoning Adjustments Thursday afternoon unanimously rejected a proposal by the California Department of Parks and Recreation to charge fees at 14 parking lots at 10 free beaches along the Sonoma Coast.

State parks sought a county coastal development permit to install self-pay, metal collection boxes, known as "iron rangers", and signs in the parking lots of the beaches in the Sonoma Coast and Salt Point state parks.

State park officials did not mention in its application how much the one-day parking fee would be, but it previously said it wanted to charge $8.

In its permit application, the State Parks Department said the parking fees are needed because of budget shortfalls and a mandate from the state legislature to increase its revenue. Stephanie Coleman, a State Parks environmental coordinator, told the five zoning board directors the money is needed for maintenance and public safety.

Several state beaches and Sonoma County parks along the coast already charge parking fees. Many of the two-dozen people who spoke against the parking fees at the hearing this afternoon said a public safety hazard already exists on the Sonoma Coast because people are parking alongside Highway 1 and on narrow residential streets to avoid paying existing parking fees.

Charging for parking at more beaches will make matters worse, they said. "I hate to think that Highway 1 will become a parking lot. It's a disaster waiting to happen," said Doug Pike of Healdsburg. Other speakers said more parking fees would prevent lower income residents from visiting the Sonoma Coast. Several speakers said the free beaches provide a spiritual respite from daily stress.

Zoning board staff members recommended that the parking fee application be denied and "maximum access" to the beaches be preserved. The staff said that under the state Coastal Act, the only limitations to "maximum access" are public safety, protection of public rights, protection of private property rights and protection of natural resource areas.

"This law does not list fiscal or budgetary constraints as a basis to limit that "maximum access," the staff report stated. Zoning board chairman Jason Liles said, "These 'iron rangers' will become iron gates and a threat to public safety." Board member Don Bennett said he is concerned about public safety and other unintended issues that would arise if the parking fee application is approved.

Board member Pamela Davis said, "Free parking protects the environment, public safety, private property and preserves public access," she said. "It (the parking fees) feels like another revenue grab by the state," Davis said.

The California Department of Parks and Recreation has 10 days to appeal the zoning board's decision to the Sonoma County Planning Commission.

Coleman said she will inform State Parks management about the opinions given at the hearing, and the decision regarding an appeal rests with the Department's director.

Copyright © 2013 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Stay Patched in! Follow Napa Valley Patch on Twitter | Like Napa Valley Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news | Got something to say? Start a blog and share your views.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Napa Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
MICHAEL WILSON May 17, 2013 at 10:34 am
Yes I think so I had to add a whole new profile
Loui Loui May 17, 2013 at 10:02 am
Do we have to reupload it?
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau May 17, 2013 at 05:33 pm
People hate change, that's why it's empty.
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau May 17, 2013 at 05:32 pm
People hate change. That's why it's empty.
Loui Loui May 17, 2013 at 03:42 pm
I'm surprised how empty it is. Where is everyone???
Arts Council Napa Valley May 17, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Do you know about our Arts in Schools Grant program? Running annually, the grant program offersRead More teachers $ for art school supplies, professional development activities, and more! www.artscouncilnapavalley.org
MICHAEL WILSON May 15, 2013 at 10:09 pm
Yes the comment ticker was great
Loui Loui May 15, 2013 at 08:59 am
I'm still trying to get the feel of it. It is easier on the eyes. I do miss the comment ticker.Read More Unless it's here somewhere and I haven't seen it yet.
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau May 14, 2013 at 10:55 pm
Why do the Hispanics need their own Chamber Of Commerce? Asians, African-Americans, Caucasians,Read More Indians, and all other races use the same Chamber Of Commerce in unity. The Hispanics are welcome to use it as well. Unless they're promoting their own race above others in the business community. Naw, they wouldn't do anything racist like that, would they?