This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Napa Wins Settlement vs. Diet Company

The manufacturer made false claims that its products' weight-loss effects had been proven in the 'largest clinical study' ever conducted, according to nine California counties, including Napa.

By Bay City News Service

Napa County is one of nine California counties that have won a $900,000 false advertising settlement against a company accused of misleading customers with promises of weight loss.

The case against Sensa Products and its parent corporation, Intelligent Beauty, revolved around the company's "sprinkle diet" product, called Tastants, flavored crystals sold nationally that the product makers promised would help people who sprinkled them on food lose weight, according to the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office.

Find out what's happening in Napa Valleywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley said that the lawsuit, brought by nine California district attorney's offices, including Napa's, was necessary because the federal government does not regulate the dietary supplement market.

"Unlike prescription medication, dietary supplements do not need to be pre-approved by the FDA before they can be sold to consumers. A dietary supplement can be sold in the United States without prior government approval or proof that it is either safe or effective for its intended use," O'Malley said.

Find out what's happening in Napa Valleywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

According to the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office, the product became the subject of a Statewide Nutritional Supplement Task Force investigation after it made claims that its weight loss effects had been clinically proven in the "largest clinical study" ever conducted. An independent expert concluded that the study did not meet scientific or
competency standards.

As part of the settlement, Sensa and Intelligent Beauty are permanently prohibited from making claims about the effectiveness of their product without first having verifiable, reliable scientific evidence.

The companies are also forbidden from continuing to charge customers for shipments they sent customers who had requested that their orders be cancelled and from enrolling customers in an automatic shipping program without letting customers know about their obligations to the program.

The lawsuit was filed in Santa Cruz County by the district attorneys for the counties of Santa Cruz, Alameda, Marin, Monterey, Napa, Orange, Santa Clara, Solano and Sonoma.

Stay Patched in! Follow Napa Valley Patch on Twitter | Like Napa Valley Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news | Got something to say? Start a blog and share your views.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?