.
Feedback

Final Election Results Released for Napa County

The wait is over: Napa County elections chief John Tuteur has certified the final official results for the Nov. 6 election, and there were no upsets lurking in the totals. Updated with voter statistics.

Residents of Calistoga no longer have to wonder who their next mayor will be: It's Chris Canning, who defeated Paul Knoblich by less than 60 votes (926-868) in the Nov. 6 election.

The Napa County Election Division Tuesday certified the results of that general election and posted them online with precinct-detail certified statements of vote inked to the ballot contests.

We've included the complete tallies at the end of this article; here are some quick links from the Election Division website:

Registration & Turnout PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT U.S. SENATOR CONGRESS 5th STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 3 STATE ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 4 BOARD OF EDUCATION, AREA 7 NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE, AREA 6 ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST POPE VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DIST SUPERVISOR, 2nd DISTRICT MAYOR, CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF AMERICAN CANYON MAYOR, CITY OF CALISTOGA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF CALISTOGA MAYOR, CITY OF NAPA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF NAPA MAYOR, CITY OF ST. HELENA MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF ST. HELENA STATE PROP 30 STATE PROP 31 STATE PROP 32 STATE PROP 33 STATE PROP 34 STATE PROP 35 STATE PROP 36 STATE PROP 37 STATE PROP 38 STATE PROP 39 STATE PROP 40 MEASURE C MEASURE S MEASURE T MEASURE U MEASURE V MEASURE B MEASURE G

John Tuteur, Napa County Registrar of Voters, said the additional 24,957 ballots that were counted after Nov. 6 and are now included in the final certified results did not change the outcome of any contest published on election night, even though vote margins did change. 

In the race to represent Napa County District 2 on the board of supervisors, for instance, incumbent Mark Luce only extended his Election Night margin of victory over challenger Mark Van Gorder by a slender fraction of a percent.

Unofficial results gave Luce almost 51.98 percent of the vote to Van Gorder's 48.02 percent, while the final count was 52.06 percent for Luce, 47.94 percent for Van Gorder out of more than 11,000 district votes.

“I am pleased that once again Napa County voters turned out in greater numbers than the statewide average with 79.45% of registered voters casting ballots,” Tuteur said in a statement. 

In statewide voter turnout Napa County ranks in the top 10 counties having more than 50,000 registered voters, Tuteur said.

"Between Election Day and the release of the certified results on November 27, 2012, election staff and citizen poll workers processed and counted the additional ballots including duplicating 2,260 ballots that could not be read by the optical scanner; resolving 1,275 provisional ballots of which 69.7% were counted and conducting a manual tally of 1,743 ballots selected at random," Tuteur wrote.

“These post Election Day procedures allow candidates and the public to have confidence in the ballot tabulation and optical scanning technologies that we use,” he added.

Tuteur provided other statistics including:

  • Vote by mail voters are 84.79% of county registered voters
  • Vote by mail voters cast 89.17% of all ballots cast.
  • Vote by mail permanent voters turnout was 87.73% of those who received ballots   
  • Vote by mail precinct voters turnout was 78.76% of those who received ballots
  • Polling place voters turnout was 56.59% of those who received sample ballot pamphlets

Please see below for the complete final certified election results for Napa County.

Stay Patched in! Follow Napa Valley Patch on Twitter | Like Napa Valley Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news | Got something to say? Start a blog and share your views.

Final certified election results for Napa County, from countyofnapa.org:

Last Updated: November 27, 2012 9:35 AM

Registration & Turnout 72,592 Voters

Vote Count Percent Vote by Mail Turnout 51,421 70.84% Election Day Turnout 6,251 8.61% Total 57,672 79.45%


 

PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT 
Statement of Vote by Precinct
Write-In Votes 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent DEM - BARACK OBAMA 35,870 63.09% REP - MITT ROMNEY 19,526 34.34% LIB - GARY JOHNSON 601 1.06% GRN - JILL STEIN 455 0.80% PF - ROSEANNE BARR 241 0.42% AI - THOMAS HOEFLING 160 0.28% Total 56,853 100.00%


 

U.S. SENATOR 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent DEM - DIANNE FEINSTEIN 37,122 66.52% REP - ELIZABETH EMKEN 18,682 33.48% Total 55,804 100.00%


 

CONGRESS 5th 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent DEM - MIKE THOMPSON 39,765 71.46% REP - RANDY LOFTIN 15,881 28.54% Total 55,646 100.00%


 

STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 3 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent DEM - LOIS WOLK 32,920 61.29% REP - FRANK MIRANDA 20,796 38.71% Total 53,716 100.00%


 

STATE ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 4 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent DEM - MARIKO YAMADA 32,799 61.16% REP - JOHN MUNN 20,828 38.84% Total 53,627 100.00%


 

BOARD OF EDUCATION, AREA 7 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 33/33 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - JENNIFER D. KRESGE 4,083 56.13% NON - STEVE HERDELL 3,191 43.87% Total 7,274 100.00%


 

NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE, AREA 6 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 21/21 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - JOANN BUSENBARK 4,291 53.09% NON - ROSAURA SEGURA 3,792 46.91% Total 8,083 100.00%


 

ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 17/17 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - MARIA HAUG 2,185 55.33% NON - JOSEFINA HURTADO 1,764 44.67% Total 3,949 100.00%


 

POPE VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DIST 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 2/2 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - PAUL KIMSEY 203 28.43% NON - JOE MOSLEY 178 24.93% NON - KATHERINE R GONZALEZ 170 23.81% NON - SUSAN J HAGAR 163 22.83% Total 714 100.00%


 

SUPERVISOR, 2nd DISTRICT 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 35/35 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - MARK LUCE 5,829 52.06% NON - MARK VAN GORDER 5,367 47.94% Total 11,196 100.00%


 

MAYOR, CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 8/8 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - LEON GARCIA 4,825 75.14% NON - GUS VIALE 1,596 24.86% Total 6,421 100.00%


 

MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF AMERICAN CANYON 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 8/8 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - JOAN BENNETT 3,192 29.70% NON - KENNETH LEARY 2,553 23.75% NON - CINDY LOU COFFEY 2,240 20.84% NON - STACY L. SU 1,720 16.00% NON - JEFFERY JONES 1,043 9.70% Total 10,748 100.00%


 

MAYOR, CITY OF CALISTOGA 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 5/5 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - CHRIS CANNING 926 51.62% NON - PAUL KNOBLICH 868 48.38% Total 1,794 100.00%


 

MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF CALISTOGA 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 5/5 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - CARL SHERRILL 781 23.21% NON - MICHAEL DUNSFORD 741 22.02% NON - CHARLOTTE WILLIAMS 711 21.13% NON - JAMES W. BARNES 638 18.96% NON - JACK GINGLES 419 12.45% NON - LARRY C. ELLIOTT 75 2.23% Total 3,365 100.00%


 

MAYOR, CITY OF NAPA 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 87/87 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - JILL TECHEL 17,868 61.28% NON - PETER MOTT 11,289 38.72% Total 29,157 100.00%


 

MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF NAPA 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 87/87 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - SCOTT SEDGLEY 11,320 22.69% NON - ALFREDO PEDROZA 10,632 21.31% NON - DORIS GENTRY 9,112 18.26% NON - JIM KRIDER 8,312 16.66% NON - ALEX PADER 4,723 9.47% NON - WILLIAM LEE BOPF 3,450 6.91% NON - CHARLIE ROSE 2,347 4.70% Total 49,896 100.00%


 

MAYOR, CITY OF ST. HELENA 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 5/5 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - DELFORD G. BRITTON 1,410 53.27% NON - ALAN GALBRAITH 1,237 46.73% Total 2,647 100.00%


 

MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL OF ST. HELENA 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 5/5 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NON - SHARON SHAW CRULL 1,440 50.54% NON - GREGORY J. PITTS 1,409 49.46% Total 2,849 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 30 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 32,921 59.40% NO 22,504 40.60% Total 55,425 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 31 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 29,986 58.73% YES 21,068 41.27% Total 51,054 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 32 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 31,174 57.26% YES 23,272 42.74% Total 54,446 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 33 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 30,171 56.40% YES 23,319 43.60% Total 53,490 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 34 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 27,380 50.24% YES 27,123 49.76% Total 54,503 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 35 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 45,843 84.50% NO 8,412 15.50% Total 54,255 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 36 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 38,300 70.63% NO 15,923 29.37% Total 54,223 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 37 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 27,973 50.74% YES 27,162 49.26% Total 55,135 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 38 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 38,788 71.78% YES 15,248 28.22% Total 54,036 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 39 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 32,737 61.65% NO 20,367 38.35% Total 53,104 100.00%


 

STATE PROP 40 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 37,896 75.10% NO 12,565 24.90% Total 50,461 100.00%


 

MEASURE C 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 17/17 100.00%

Vote Count Percent BONDS YES 2,782 59.58% BONDS NO 1,887 40.42% Total 4,669 100.00%


 

MEASURE S 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 39,333 77.64% NO 11,329 22.36% Total 50,662 100.00%


 

MEASURE T 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 39,462 74.77% NO 13,313 25.23% Total 52,775 100.00%


 

MEASURE U 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent NO 30,761 60.48% YES 20,101 39.52% Total 50,862 100.00%


 

MEASURE V 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 167/167 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 45,449 87.45% NO 6,524 12.55% Total 51,973 100.00%


 

MEASURE B 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 5/5 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 1,079 58.01% NO 781 41.99% Total 1,860 100.00%


 

MEASURE G 
Statement of Vote by Precinct 8/8 100.00%

Vote Count Percent YES 3,378 53.29% NO 2,961 46.71% Total 6,339 100.00%



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Napa Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Loui Loui June 17, 2013 at 08:58 am
An actual post with the information and image of the home on this site would've been helpful -Read More instead of just a lazy link.
F Otterbeck June 17, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Is there any way to remove the blogs from the news page? Blogs are not news. They are opinionRead More pieces, and I would like more news. thanks!
Keri Brenner (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 05:41 pm
Hi Beau and F: Yes, the &#39 are still there and not going away. I trust that tech people areRead More working on this...Sorry. And as far as the blogs being on the news stream, I can't change that except to keep the blogs mostly at the bottom and the news on top. The new platform is designed to highlight the blogs more than they were before. Occasionally if there is a timely, useful or highly newsworthy blog post I will move it up, but in general the news will be in the first 5 slots and the blog below. Hope that helps. Keri
F Otterbeck June 19, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Promoting blogs instead of news makes the Patch less useful. I liked having an alternate newsRead More source. Blogger promotion is too much like stroking the egos of local bloggers rather than promoting news and information. It seriously compromises the value of Napa Valley Patch as a news source.
Louisa Hufstader (Editor) June 16, 2013 at 02:47 am
Go, Jamie! I voted, all the way out here in lobsterland where I hope you and Kevin will visit someRead More day.
Roberta Goodin June 16, 2013 at 05:49 pm
Jamie, I have clicked on you several times and wish you the best! Salad sounds wonderful! Roberta
Jamie Brown Miller June 18, 2013 at 07:07 am
You're all so very kind! Thank you from the bottom of my heart!
Kimberly Olson June 14, 2013 at 08:18 am
It is easy to judge people from a distance. All of us have up and down times in life, none of usRead More have the same internal or external supports to deal with it all. Maybe those among us who feel superior could try to take a moment or more to see life from the perspective of someone who (even from a position of pain or vulnerability) has too much pride to accept the stigma of being in need of the social translation of "the lowest of the low" homeless shelter or addiction counseling. It feels good to try lifting others up rather than tearing them down; Maybe your smile or expression of something other than disgust could make a positive difference to move a person in need toward help.
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau June 14, 2013 at 06:17 pm
Lo! And behold! If you check today's (Friday, June 14) Fugitive page on Napa Valley Patch you willRead More see Benjamin Paz, the one and same who was arrested for being naked at the Expo.
Ray Richards June 15, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Thank you Marlene for your story, It is a tragic and difficult life that many homeless people haveRead More to live and I always thank my god that I have been more fortunate. I would like to respectfully suggest though that you break your future comments (and I hope there are many more) into paragraphs to make them easier to read. Thank you and I hope you well.
Keri Brenner (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Not the case. It's definitely on the list of stories to cover. Absolutely! Thanks for the reminder!
J. Roland Wagner June 13, 2013 at 08:06 am
Before advocating change, be sure of what you will obtain by such a change. I haven't seen anythingRead More that concerned me with Libersteins decisions.
MICHAEL WILSON June 13, 2013 at 08:27 pm
If He is running unopposed It would be a waste of Ink. Or in the case of media of the day A waste ofRead More electricity. Look at the County Sheriff We are stuck with Who ever the Union wants
Loui Loui June 13, 2013 at 10:25 pm
I'd like to show appreciation to my grandfather on Father's Day. He taught me how to cook a roast,Read More garden, work with tools, use a shotgun and appreciate our surrounding waters. Always a patient man, my grandfather showed me so much. I got scared once when I broke a tool when we were building a skateboard ramp. He just replied with, at least you know not to do that anymore. I always admired how my grandfather loves my grandmother so much. That's old, true love. Fairy tail kinda stuff. Love we all want to grow old with. I love my grandpa with all my heart.
Keri Brenner (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 06:19 pm
Hi Loui Loui: Your grandpa sounds wonderful!
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau June 13, 2013 at 10:41 am
Loui Loui, it's called false pretenses and misleading claims. While I understand it's not theRead More editor's or tech's fault, releasing a product to the public as "New with better features!" shouldn't mean that it comes with glitches, bugs and frustration. And unlike Google+ and FB, Napa Valley Patch didn't "come out", we had a NVP that was working perfectly fine and Corporate Patch decided to upgrade. Can you imagine the ether-riots if FB did an "upgrade" full of glitches and bugs"?
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau June 13, 2013 at 10:54 pm
Actually, Loui, I left FB two years ago and haven't been back since. And while Patch and FB may beRead More "free" services they rely on users to exist. It's a symbiotic relationship, so both sides must be content for it to work efficiently.
MICHAEL WILSON June 15, 2013 at 10:24 am
I am With USS on Facebook I have never Been there. I use the Patch and a few Blogs I also have myRead More own Website. Facebook has gone into the censorship business, from what many are telling me.
Unfiltered Steve Simoneau June 10, 2013 at 06:42 pm
Why the Hispanics need their own Chambers Of Commerce is a mystery to me. Racism is the promotion ofRead More one race above others. If I supported a White/Caucasian Chamber Of Commerce I'd be labeled a bigot and racist. One Chamber Of Commerce should suffice for ALL!
Harold Edwards June 11, 2013 at 01:15 am
All the Chamber of Commerce promotes is slave labor pure & simple.It screws the worker &Read More practices unfair labor for business big and small.They are not a team player there only for the team owner!! Don't fall for there wicked ways.
Renée Bell (Courtesy photo)
Amy Larson June 12, 2013 at 02:22 pm
It says 7 comments for this article when it's on the side. When you go to the post, there are 0.Read More This will show up as the first one.
Amy Larson June 12, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Sorry, "comment". Now it's adding to the count with each real comment.
gaylon June 6, 2013 at 03:39 pm
Loui Loui, Will do! So happy to hear of your interest in this important issue..
Janice June 11, 2013 at 10:21 am
Gaylon. I will be there and bring my husband along as well. Great speaker , he should really informRead More us all on just what is going on.....
gaylon June 11, 2013 at 11:03 am
Janice, Thank you for your interest...This is a huge concern for most citizens....Bring aRead More neighbor...See you there...