.

Napa Letter: "Let's Vote Yes on Proposition 37"

"Consumers have the right to know what they eat," writes Glynda Velasco of Napa. We welcome letters to the editor at napa@patch.com. You can also start a blog to share your opinions any time.

Dear Editor, 

I encourage the community to vote “Yes” on Proposition 37 to label genetically engineered food. The main reason is consumers have the right to know what they eat. Genetically engineered food uses a technology that takes the DNA or genes of one organism, such as bacteria, and inserts them into another organism, such as a plant, to impart a desired trait. For example, Monsanto has created corn, including sweet corn, that is engineered with genes from bacteria to withstand sprayings of Roundup herbicide, and the corn itself produces an insecticide.

Other genetically engineered crops on the market in the United States are soybeans, canola, cotton, sugar beets, Hawaiian papaya, alfalfa, and some zucchini and yellow crookneck squash. These ingredients appear in many processed foods and consumer products. However, without labeling it is not clear which products contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Lately, there has been a rise in food allergies and food sensitivities. There has been a link between food allergies and food sensitivities to learning, behavioral, and mood disorders. Do we know if GMOs cause these or other health risks? We cannot be sure unless we can identify what we put in our bodies.

This measure only requires companies to clearly label genetically engineered food. It will not create an additional cost to the consumer. The opposition will state that this will be an expensive procedure and will increase the price of food. This is not true. These companies change their labels all the time, and their only expense would be the additional ink.

Nearly 50 countries including all of Europe, Australia, Japan and China require the labeling of GE food. However, the United States does not have this requirement.

We do have the right to know what is in our food. We do have a right to choose what we eat. Let California lead the way, and let’s vote “Yes” on Proposition 37. For more information, go to www.carighttoknow.org.

Glynda Velasco 
Napa

Do you have a comment? We'd like to know what you think. Napa Patch asks that commenters use human names, rather than slogans, when taking part in our community conversation. If you'd rather remain anonymous, feel free to email comments to napa@patch.com.

Napa Patch becomes Napa Valley Patch Sept. 27! Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news | Got something to say? Start a blog and share your views with the valley.

Joejoe25@hotmail.com October 02, 2012 at 05:42 AM
Also it is important to keep in mind that GMO means that farmers do not own their seeds. Monsanto owns the intellectual property rights of these seeds and has sued farmers when GMO seeds have accidentally blow onto a field of a farmer growing non-GMO plants. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_Canada_Inc._v._Schmeiser Do you want to create a situation in which all seeds are controlled by a handful of large corporations? This is unheard of tyranny! Vote yes on 37

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something